Japan: Patriot Missiles as Smoke and Mirrors

Japan: Patriot Missiles as Smoke and Mirrors
South Korean Navy's destroyer Yulgok Yi I (R), U.S. Navy's aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (C), and Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force's Umigiri (L) sail in formation during a joint naval exercise in international waters off South Korea's southern island of Jeju on April 4, 2023. (South Korean Defense Ministry via Getty Images)
Grant Newsham
12/29/2023
Updated:
1/2/2024
0:00
Commentary

Japan recently announced that it will transfer some number—reportedly “dozens”—of license-built Patriot missiles to the United States in order to bolster American missile stocks depleted by two years of supplying Ukraine in its defense against the Russian invasion.

This is Japan’s first time to export military weaponry owing to longstanding—though informal—policy restrictions.

It makes for a good headline, and some analysts view it as a significant step and a sign Japan is stepping up to its global security responsibilities.

But on closer look, it seems more smoke and mirrors, intended to keep the Americans in the Asia-Pacific and on the hook to defend Japan (and Taiwan). And from shifting more resources and attention to Europe and the Middle East. I’ll explain.

The Missiles

The news Japan would hand over Patriot missiles raised some eyebrows among people who follow Japan’s defense.

One wasn’t aware that the Japan Self-Defense Forces (JSDF) was flush with extra Patriot missiles for its own batteries.

In fact, JSDF arsenals and magazines are believed to have inadequate stocks of missiles, artillery shells, bombs, and ammunition—not at all enough of what’s needed to fight a war.

So it’s puzzling that Japan will provide the Americans with Patriot missiles when they don’t have enough for themselves.

The Wall Street Journal report mentions “dozens” of missiles to be transferred to the United States.

Dozens? The number will probably turn out to be even fewer. Say, 30 or 40 missiles?

Unless these missiles have magic properties, this isn’t enough to compensate for the American missile shortfall.

It’s mentioned that Japan will step up missile production. But this will take some time, and one fairly doubts the output will be sufficient to make a difference for the Americans—or even for the JSDF.

A Political Move?

This all seems like a political move. One observer calls it “virtue signaling”—intended to demonstrate Japan’s support for the overstretched United States, which is heavily engaged with Ukraine and also supplying Israel with armaments.

In return, the American commitment to defend Japan is “solidified.”

Viewed this way, it’s a strategic investment. Japan supplies a small number of missiles and potentially gets the full weight of available U.S. military support in return when the time comes to deal with China—and possibly North Korea and Russia.

Meanwhile, Team Biden can point to Japanese backing for the administration’s policy toward Ukraine at a time when a number of European and some other countries—not to mention U.S. legislators—are hesitant or opposed to future support for Kyiv.

Is This Really a Sea Change for Japan?

An optimist might point out that Japan’s willingness to export missiles (lethal weapons) made under U.S. license to the United States shows that Japan is getting over its allergy to national defense.

Yes, it is progress in the sense that it has never been done before.

But one feels that Tokyo is looking to do just enough—or even a little less.

Despite plans to double defense spending, revise key defense guidelines, and order some long-range attack missiles, Japan still isn’t taking enough of the concrete steps necessary to improve its defenses. And sending along a handful of missiles to the United States doesn’t change this reality.

The JSDF, the Japanese government, and the public are not ready to fight a war.

Indeed, Tokyo’s agreement on Patriot missiles brings to mind then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe giving President-elect Donald Trump an expensive golf club as a gift. One needn’t be a total cynic to suggest the Japanese wanted to put Mr. Trump in a good mood, so he didn’t ask or demand Japan to do more defense-wise. It, by and large, worked.
A small number of Patriot missiles may be intended to have the same effect as the Abe-Trump golf club.

But Aren’t You Being Overly Harsh, Newsham?

After all, Japan is making progress and finally exporting lethal weapons (sort of).

That’s true. But it needed to do this—and start other defense improvements 10 years ago.

Japan doesn’t have time to dither and isn’t moving anywhere near fast enough.

Excuses are easier and still the coin of the realm in Tokyo. “Too hard,” “too expensive,” “politically difficult,” and “the constitution won’t allow it.”

But Japan has always been willing to reinterpret laws and the constitution to modify unwritten policies restricting defense activities and do what is necessary when it thinks it must.

The Americans haven’t given the Japanese a reason to think they must.

And it appears Japan’s enemies still haven’t either.

When it comes to defense, “Japan is serious about getting serious”—but not much beyond that.

A few Patriot missiles are not serious.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Grant Newsham is a retired U.S. Marine officer and a former U.S. diplomat and business executive with many years in the Asia/Pacific region. He is a senior fellow with the Japan Forum for Strategic Studies (Tokyo) and Center for Security Policy and the Yorktown Institute in Washington, D.C. He is the author of the best selling book “When China Attacks: A Warning to America.”
Related Topics